Why Investing In Emerging Markets Via An Index Is Not The Best Way

Many investors prefer to gain exposure to emerging markets by investing in a fund such as an ETF that replicates an index. However the idea of index investing in emerging markets is not the best way to invest in these markets for a number of reasons. In a recent article last month, Laurent Saltiel of Alliance Bernstein highlighted a few issues with investing in EM using an index such as the popular MSCI Emerging Markets index.

From the article titled Emerging-Market Benchmarks Miss the Mark:

Emerging Markets Index Issues

In the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, about 78% of the market capitalization (excluding China) is in countries growing slower than average. For example, Korea and Taiwan (two fairly mature economies) together account for more than a quarter of the total benchmark. Yet India accounts for only 8% of the benchmark, even though it has a population of more than 1.2 billion, attractive demographic trends and a dynamic economy benefiting from numerous market-friendly reforms.

China’s benchmarks also pose concentration risks. The MSCI China Index is heavily skewed toward state-owned companies, which tend to have fairly poor corporate governance and suffer from heavy government intervention. State-owned enterprises also weigh heavily in the benchmarks of other countries like Brazil and Russia. In addition, attractive areas of investment with strong long-term growth prospects like healthcare or education together account for less than 4% of the MSCI Emerging Markets index.

Source: Emerging-Market Benchmarks Miss the Mark, Alliance Bernstein

In addition to the above the following are some of the other issues with investing using indices in EM:

  • Country-specific indices for emerging countries tend to be heavy in financials as banks and other financials dominate these economies. For example, the iShares Indonesia ETF has about 37% invested in financials. Having high exposure to any one sector is risky especially in volatile developing countries.
  • Many fast-growing firms in these markets are small and medium-sized and they may not be part of the major indices. So to profit from these firms one has to go beyond the indices.
  • Passive investing via an index involves less work for an investor. However since an index provider determines the constituents investors can miss undiscovered gems which try to ride the economic booms in these markets.
  • Since indices are followed by institutions and other big investors much of the attention goes towards the big firms that form the indices leading to over-crowded trades. By going into areas off the beaten path investors can find niche companies that cater to the local market better.
  • Going with index investing prevents an investor from executing a specific strategy such as growth or dividend investing. For example, an income investor may want to capture the high dividends paid out by Chilean banks but buying a fund that replicates an index will not help to implement a dividend investing strategy. This is because the index will constituents firms from sectors such as mining, retail, commodities, etc. that the investor may not be interested in.

In summary, investors must be highly selective when it comes to investing in emerging markets and not follow the crowd by choosing an index fund. Higher returns can be generated from fast-growing firms in these markets by carefully researching and owning then while the majority of market participants avoid them.

Disclosure: No Positions

Three Facts About UK Dividend Payers

The British equity market is a fertile ground for income investors. The benchmark FTSE 100 index had a dividend yield of 4.2% in February. For comparison, the S&P 500 has a dividend yield of about 2%.

The following are three interesting facts about dividend payers in the UK market:

  1. More than 50% of income in the UK market comes from just 10 companies.
  2. Of these firms, the top five are BP, Shell, HSBC, GlaxoSmithKline and Vodafone.
  3. Hence two sectors – oil & gas and financials – account for a substantial portion of total UK dividends paid.

Click to enlarge

Top-10-UK-Dividend-Payers

 

Source: Five reasons UK equity inome remains a compelling opportunity, by Christopher Metcalfe, FE Trustnet

MSCI Emerging Markets Index: 5-Year and Long-Term Returns

Emerging equity markets have soared so far this year easily outperforming developed markets. With the exception of China, countries such as Brazil, Russia, etc. are up by double digit percentages. Russia’s RTS is up by 26% and Brazil’s Bovespa has shot up by 35% year-to-date.

For investors tracking emerging markets, the main benchmark index is the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. In this post, let us take a quick look at the performance of this index over two different periods.

a) MSCI Emerging Markets Index – 5-Year Return:

Click to enlarge

MSCI Emerging markets index-5 years Return

b) MSCI Emerging Markets Index – Long-Term Return:

MSCI Emerging markets index-Long Term Return

Source: MSCI

Related ETFs:

  • Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO)
  • iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM)

Disclosure: No Positions

Trade-Offs: What Other Things U.S. Defense Expenditures Could Pay For

The U.S. defense spending is the highest in the world. In fact, the amount spent each year is more than the combined military expenditures of the next few countries.

According to the National Priorities Project, US taxpayers paid $528.49 billion for the Department of Defense. Unlike allocations to other areas, allocations to the military in the Federal budget is usually not given much thought by the Congress. The National Priorities Project questions if the country is making the right choices in allocating high portion of the annual budget to defense.

Here is how a dollar paid by taxpayers is spent by the state:

Click to enlarge

US Tax Dollar Spending Chart

Source: National Priorities Project

After health spending, the second highest allocation goes to defense. This is not surprising since the military is huge and it takes a lot of money to maintain a world-class military. However some have argued that one way to reduce the burden on American taxpayers is to shift the costs to some of the allies such as Germany South Korea, etc. This way American taxpayers do not have end up footing the bill, for example, to protect South Koreans from a North Korean invasion or Germans from Russia. Countries such as Germany and South Korea are wealthy enough to be able to pay the cost of protection.

The billions of dollars spent on defense could have paid for the following instead:

6.54 million Elementary School Teachers for 1 Year, or
7.13 million Clean Energy Jobs Created for 1 Year, or
9.51 million Infrastructure Jobs Created for 1 Year, or
5.28 million Jobs with Supports Created in High Poverty Communities for 1 Year, or
62.58 million Head Start Slots for Children for 1 Year, or
51.15 million Military Veterans Receiving VA Medical Care for 1 Year, or
15.91 million Scholarships for University Students for 4 Years, or
22.72 million Students Receiving Pell Grants of $5,815 for 4 Years, or
222.93 million Children Receiving Low-Income Healthcare for 1 Year, or
595.33 million Households with Wind Power for 1 Year, or
148.46 million Adults Receiving Low-Income Healthcare for 1 Year, or
367.73 million Households with Solar Electricity for 1 Year

Source: TRADE-OFFS: YOUR MONEY, YOUR CHOICES,  National Priorities Project

 

ASX All Ordinaries PE Ratio and Dividend Yield Since 1980

Australian stocks have high dividend yields compared to US stocks. Investors starved for income should consider investing in Australia not only for the high yields but also for their dividend stability and potential price appreciation. Historically Australian firms have had generous dividend payout policies and many firms did not cut or reduce dividends during the Global Financial Crisis(GFC) of 2008-09.

At the end of last month Australia’s ASX All Ordinaries Index had a P/E ratio of over 17 and a dividend yield of 4.27%, The following chart shows the historical PE ratio and dividend yield since 1980.

Click to enlarge

ASX All Ordinaries PE Ratio and Dividend Yields since 1980 Chart

Source: Market Index

Download:

Some of the Australian ADRs trading on the US markets are:

  • Westpac Banking Corp (WBK), National Australia Bank Limited (NABZY), Commonwealth Bank of Australia (CMWAY) and Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Limited (ANZBY)  in the banking sector. All have dividend yields of over 5%.  Australia does not deduct dividend withholding taxes for US investors.
  • Telstra Corp Ltd (TLSYY) in the telcom sector
  • Beverages maket Coca-Cola Amatil (CCLAY)

Note: Dividend yields noted above are as of Aug 26, 2016. Data is known to be accurate from sources used.Please use your own due diligence before making any investment decisions.

Disclosure: Long NABZY and WBK