Which Is Better For Investment – ETFs Or Stocks

Exchange-Traded Funds(ETFs) have soared in popularity in recent years. Today the ETF industry is huge and competes strongly against mutual funds.One can find ETFs of all shapes and sizes and ETFs are available to practically cover any asset class, region, sector, etc. In fact, the alphabetical soup of ETF available on the market can be intimidating for some investors. Despite the tremendous growth of this asset class there are plenty of pitfalls of owning them especially when compared to stocks. In this post let us discuss some of the advantages and disadvntages of ETFs over stocks.

Due to the wide avaialbility and depth of the ETF market, some financial advisors even suggest holding an all-ETF portfolio. This is not a wise strategy for a variety of reasons including some of the onesdiscussed below.

1. ETFs have many advantages including Transparency, Flexibility, Greater scrutiny and Versatility according to State Street Global Advisers’ Jo McCaffrey. However because they arederivate products they are also much more volatile than stocks or other under-lying assets. Due the recent volatile days, some ETFs  including the iShares Core U.S. Value ETF(IUSVplunged more than then value of the underlying stocks. This problem does exist for the most part with investing directly in stocks.

From an August Journal article:

Monday’s mayhem exposed significant flaws in the new architecture of Wall Street, where stock-linked funds—as much as shares themselves—now trade en masse on U.S. markets.

Many traders reported difficulty buying and selling exchange-traded funds, a popular investment in which baskets of stocks and other assets are packaged to facilitate easy trading. Dozens of ETFs traded at sharp discounts to their net asset value—or their components’ worth—leading to outsize losses for investors who entered sell orders at the depth of the panic.

The article noted a few examples of ETF price volatility that day. Here is one example:

For example, the $2.5 billion Vanguard Consumer Staples Index ETF and the $5.8 billion Vanguard Health Care Index ETF both plunged 32% within the opening minutes of trading. The Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF was halted six times over the course of 37 minutes early in the day, according to trading records. The health-care ETF was halted eight times Monday.

The declines in these and other ETFs were notable in that they exceeded the declines in the prices of their underlying holdings. In the case of the Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF, the value of the underlying holdings in the fund fell only 9%, according to FactSet.

Source: Stock-Market Tumult Exposes Flaws in Modern Markets, Aug 25, 2015, WSJ

2.Investing in ETFs involves fees paid to the provider.Even though this fee may be extremely small for some funds, they are still fees that eat away part of returns. Investing in stocks does not involve any recurring fees other than the one time trade commission for buying.

3. Some of the ETFs may not be well diversified and may have heavy concentration in certain sector or stocks. For instance, some country-specific ETFs have concentrated allocations to financials. Buying this ETF exposes an investor to high risk should financials tank. When selecting and buying stocks this problem can be avoided. With ETFs one cannot eliminate this risk since the fund’s positions are determined and selected by the fund managers.

4.If an ETF is not profitable for a provider to operate, the fund will be closed and the liquidated cash returned to fund investors. This is not an issue with equities since an individual investor can hold the equiity as long as he wants.

5.With stocks, when a company increases dividend the shareholder receives the higher dividend. This may not occurt with ETFs meaning even if the stocks held in the fund increase their dividends the fund itself may not increase the dividends paid out to fund holders. Other events that occur with holding equities such as company spinoffs, merger and takeovers, etc. are much more favorable for direct equity holders than ETF investors.

In summary, ETFs are suitable for some situations but not in all. Ideas such as building a portfolio using only ETFs should be avoided at all cost. Though ETFs can be traded all day unlike a mutual fund, investors do not invest in ETFs to trade. Traders are in the business of trading stocks, ETFs and all other products thats out there because it is their job. For most retial investors, holding a portfolio of widely diversified stocks and using ETFs to fill gaps will suffice.

Disclosure: No Positions

The Harder A Stock Falls The Tougher It Is To Recover Losses

One of the important strategies to follow for success in equity investing is the willingness to cut losses and moving on. To become successful with investing in stocks is to accept that not all stocks one holds in a portfolio will be winners. In fact, there will some that will perform average over the years and a few that will completely crash and end up worthless. However in a portfolio of say 50 stocks, if 3 become worthless it is no big deal as long as the portfolio is well diversified and the portfolio’s assets are not most allocated to those stocks.

When a stock falls hard it is even harder to recover the losses. For example, if a stock trading at $10 falls by 50% to reach $5, an investor needs the stock to jump by 100% (going from $5 to $10) to break even. of course, it very rare for a stock to shoot up by 100% or double in price easily.

The following simple chart explains this mathematical concept:

Click to enlarge

Simple-Painful-Math-of-Investment-Losses-Chart

Source: How to Win More by Losing Less in Today’s Markets, Blackrock Blog

Here is an example. Brazilian oil giant Petrobras (PBR) reached a peak of $72.34 in early June 2008. Since then the stock has plunged consistently year after year to reach $4.08 on Friday. That is a decline of about 94% according to Yahoo Finance. In early 2001, the stock traded at around $4. So from $4 it went all the way over $72 and then came back to $4. For an investor who bought it at the peak, the stock has to increase by nearly 1800% to break even.

PBR Long-term chart

Source: Yahoo Finance

Disclosure: Long PBR

Knowledge is Power: Diversification Lessons, Crumbling Portfolio, French Households Edition

The White House

The White House

As Global Markets Seek A Direction Consider These 10 Stocks

Equity markets worldwide are volatile again and seem to moving in an aimless direction.As markets try to gain some stability and seek a direction, investors can consider the following ten stocks.In times of uncertainity certain sectors such as defensive sector can provide much needed shelter and even cheaper prices for long-term investment.

1.Company: Henkel AG & Co KGaA (HENKY)
Current Dividend Yield: 1.59%
Sector: Household Products
Country: Germany

2.Company: Reckitt Benckiser Group plc (RBGLY)
Current Dividend Yield: 2.23%
Sector: Household goods
Country: UK

3.Company:Fomento Economico Mexicano SAB de CV (FMX)
Current Dividend Yield: 0.79%
Sector:Beverages
Country:Mexico

4.Company: Church & Dwight Co Inc (CHD)
Current Dividend Yield: 1.58%
Sector:Household Products
Country: USA

5.Company: Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co (FMS)
Current Dividend Yield: 1.07%
Sector: Health Care Providers & Services
Country: Germany

6.Company: Akzo Nobel NV (AKZOY)
Current Dividend Yield: 2.50%
Sector: Paints
Country: The Netherlands

7.Company: Safran SA (SAFRY)
Current Dividend Yield: 1.84%
Sector:Aerospace & Defense
Country: France

8.Company:Vina Concha y Toro SA (VCO)
Current Dividend Yield: 2.32%
Sector:Beverages
Country: Chile

9.Company:The Clorox Co (CLX)
Current Dividend Yield: 2.69%
Sector:Household Products
Country: USA

10.Company:Colgate-Palmolive Co (CL)
Current Dividend Yield: 2.41%
Sector: Household Products
Country: USA

Note: Dividend yields noted above are as of Sept 23, 2015. Data is known to be accurate from sources used.Please use your own due diligence before making any investment decisions.

Disclosure: Long RBGLY

The Top 10 Non-Financial State-Owned Multi-National Companies

Governments in some countries own major stakes in private companies.This type of state ownership is not only limited to emerging countries but is prevalent in developed countries as well.

The table below shows the The Top 10 Non-Financial State-Owned Multi-National Companies ranked by foreign assets:

Click to enlarge
top 10 state owned mns
Source: World Investment Report 2015, UNCTAD

Volkswagen(VLKAY) is the number one state-owned multi-national Enterprise(SO-MNE) in terms of foreign assets.The German state of Lower Saxony is a large shareholder in the company with a stake of 20%.

Ownership structure of Volkswagen:

Current voting rights distribution (as at December 31, 2014)

Porsche Automobil Holding SE, Stuttgart – 50.73%
State of Lower Saxony, Hanover – 20.00%
Qatar Holding – 17.00%
Others – 12.30%

Source: Corporate site

Currently Volkswagen is in trouble in the US and other countries due to cheating on emission tests. In the past two days billions in market cap haven been wiped out as the stock plummeted.Nearly half of its total workforce is in foreign countries. Europe and China are the two largest markets for the company in terms of sales.

France has large stakes in the utilities EDF (ECIFY) and GDF Suez(GDFZY).

The US used be the largest shareholder in General Motors(GM) when it bailed out the auto maker from collapse> but a couple of years ago the US sold its last remaining stake and is no longer a shareholder in GM. At the time of the bailout GM was aptly nicknamed the “Government Motors”.

Related:

Disclosure: No Positions