Australia’s Westpac Banking Stock In Trading Halt

The stock of Westpac Banking Corp(WBK) of Australia is currently on a trading halt. Hence the ADR did not trade yesterday (Wednesday) on the NYSE. The halt is in place due to the rights offering the bank announced on Tuesday. So the stock will open for trading on Monday (10/19/15) on the Australian and other exchanges including the NYSE where Westpac is listed.

A few key points on this rights offering and related impacts are listed below:

  • Westpac is raising A$ 3.5 billion to raise its capital reserves to meet new regulatory requirements. Competitors such as National Australia Bank (NABZY) and Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Limited (ANZBY) have already raised such additional capital.
  • The trading halt is in effect to allow for institutions to bid on the rights offer over the next few days.
  • Westpac also increased its standard variable rate for mortgages by 0.20%.
  • The bank also announced its full year financial results. The results were mostly good with cash earnings per share were up by 2% compared to 2014.
  • A final dividend of A 0.944$ will be paid to current shareholders. This is higher than the dividend paid out last year.

Details on the Rights Offer:

Westpac’s stock on the domestic market (WBC.AX) closed at $30.44 on Tuesday. The rights will be offered at A$ 25.50 for a discount of 13.1%.

Existing shareholders are entitled to receive one ordinary share for every 23 they hold.  So if you hold 1,000 shares you will be entitled to 44 new shares. Current shareholders will be able to buy the new shares at A$ 25.50 per share.

Retail shareholders of Ordinary Shares have three options according to a news report:

Firstly, you can sell your entitlement – which will trade on the ASX from next Monday until Wednesday 4 November under stock code WBCR.

Secondly, you can take up your entitlement by paying $25.50 for each new share. For example, if you had 1,000 Westpac shares, you would be entitled to buy 44 new shares at $25.50 – a total cost of $1,122.00. You will need to front up with the cash by Wednesday 11 November.

Or thirdly, do nothing. In this case, your entitlements will be auctioned to the institutions on 16 November. If Westpac shares are trading above $25.50, then you should receive a payment from Westpac which represents the difference between the auction price and $25.50. These payments (if any) will be made on 19 November.

Source: Westpac shocks market with interest rate hike by Paul Richard, Switzer Daily

Things to remember for Westpac ADR shareholders:

  • WBK trading is halted till Monday according to the depository BN Mellon.
  • The ratio of ADR to Ordinary is 1:1. So the final dividend of A0.944$ will be converted to US $ at the then exchange rate and paid out after any deductions for ADR fees. However no dividend withholding taxes will be held since all the dividend is 100% franked.
  • Similar to ordinary shareholders, ADR shareholders should also be entitled to receive one ordinary share for every 23 ADR they hold. However the three options mentioned above for domestic retail investors may not be available for ADR holders. Further details on the rights offering will be published by the depository and investors will also be notified by your broker.
  • WBK last closed at $21.97. So with a 13.1% discount the rights for ADRs holders may be around $19.0 per share.

ADR investors with a long-term horizon may be better off buying the rights shares rather than selling the rights. However cash is needed in order to acquire the new shares.

Currently WBK has a dividend yield of 6.72%.

Note: Dividend yields noted above are as of Oct 14, 2015. Data is known to be accurate from sources used.Please use your own due diligence before making any investment decisions.

Disclosure: Long WBK

Overseas Markets Offer Higher Dividend Yields

U.S. investors looking for income stocks should consider adding foreign stocks. One of the important reason to go overseas for dividends is that foreign stocks generally tend to have higher dividend yields than US stocks.Despite dividend withholding taxes it is possible to generate a better return from foreign stocks.

Among the developed economies, the US is one of the few countries where companies tend to have low dividend payout ratios.The following chart shows the average dividend yields in G-20 economies:

Click to enlarge

Global Dividend Yield Comparison

Source: The Dividend Signal: Uncovering Global Growth Opportunities,  Forward Management

Five stocks from five of the countries shown above are listed below with their current dividend yields for consideration:

1.Company: Telstra Corp Ltd (TLSYY)
Current Dividend Yield: 5.48%
Sector:Telecom
Country:  Australia

2.Company: National Grid PLC (NGG)
Current Dividend Yield: 4.79%
Sector: Multi-Utilities
Country: UK

3.Company: Standard Bank Group Limited (SGBLY)
Current Dividend Yield: 4.56%
Sector: Banking
Country: South Africa

4.Company: Royal Bank of Canada (RY)
Current Dividend Yield: 4.17%
Sector: Banking
Country: Canada

5.Company:Telenor ASA (TELNY)
Current Dividend Yield: 2.43%
Sector: Telecom
Country: Norway

Note: Dividend yields noted above are as of Oct 9, 2015. Data is known to be accurate from sources used.Please use your own due diligence before making any investment decisions.

Disclosure: Long RY

Investors Can Consider Preferred Stocks For Offer Higher Yields

Preferred Stocks are better than common stocks in some ways.For instance, preferred stock holders rank higher in claims against a company’s earnings and assets. So in case a company goes bankrupt preferred holders will be paid first before common stock holders, provided there is any assets leftover after other creditors are paid.However preferreds are not risk-free investments. One can still lose money just like stocks. Preferreds are just a little better than common.

I came across a short article on Preferreds on the Charles Schwab site.From the article:

Preferred stock and hybrid preferred securities typically offer higher yields than traditional domestic fixed income investments, such as U.S. Treasury securities or investment-grade corporate bonds. With low bond yields across the globe, we think preferreds can complement a diversified fixed income portfolio for investors looking to boost their income.

Preferreds do come with heightened risks, including less growth potential than common stock and higher credit risk than corporate bonds. However,  with economic growth still positive and market participants generally expecting the Federal Reserve (Fed) to take a slow-and-low approach to raising interest rates,  we believe that they can perform well even after the first rate hike.

Preferred securities: the basics

Preferred securities—including preferred stock, hybrid preferred securities, and senior notes—share certain characteristics of both bonds and stocks.

Like bonds, they have fixed par values, generally carry ratings from credit rating agencies like Standard & Poor’s or Moody’s, and pay set coupon rates. Preferreds often have very long maturities—30 years or longer—or no maturity date at all. This means they can remain outstanding in perpetuity, which increases their sensitivity to interest-rate changes. However, most preferred securities are “callable,” meaning the issuer can retire the debt prior to maturity at a specified price after a certain period of time (usually five years after issuance), which balances the interest rate risk.

Like stock, preferred securities can represent ownership in the issuing company; however, unlike common stock, they have a fixed par value. They also rank lower in the company’s priority of payments, so their coupons are usually paid only after the issuer’s bond interest payments have been made. That means they carry higher credit risk. Consequently, preferreds tend to have slightly lower credit ratings than the issuer’s bonds.

Click to enlarge
Preferred Stocks Return Comparison

Source: Preferred Securities Can Offer Opportunities for Yield-Seeking Investors by Collin Martin, Charles Schwab

One way to invest in preferreds is via ETFs.Three of the top Preferred Stock ETFs based asset size are: iShares U.S. Preferred Stock ETF(PFF), Preferred Portfolio(PGX) and Financial Preferred Portfolio (PGF).

The iShares U.S. Preferred Stock ETF(PFF) has an asset base of over $13.5 billion and an expense ratio of 0.47%. Currently the fund has a distribution yield of 5.27%.

Disclosure: No Positions

Australian Banks’ Loans to Households and Market Share

The banking industry in Australia is similar to the Canadian banking industry in many ways. For example, the market in Canada is dominated by five large banks whereas four Australian banks are the big players in the domestic market.

The four large banks in Australia are Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Limited (ANZBY), Commonwealth Bank of Australia (CMWAY), National Australia Bank Limited (NABZY) and Westpac Banking Corporation (WBK).Concerns about the economic slowdown in China and the fears of bubble in the Australian real estate market have adversely impacted the share prices of the four Aussia banks recently with prices declines of one-third or more from the peak.

Australian banks are big lenders to households rather than corporations. Within household lending, the majority of the lending is dominated by mortgages for owner-occupied and investment properties as shown in the chart below. Hence equity investors are rightly worried about the impact of a real estate crash on the banks.

Click to enlarge

Aussie Banks Loans to Households Chart

The chart below shows the market share of lending to households. Since 2002, the four big banks have consistently increased their lending to the household sector.

Aussie Banks Loans to Households by Market Size Chart

Source: Competition in Financial Services – Research Report, Aug 2015, Centre for International Finance and Regulation

Disclosure: Long NABZY and WBK

Eight Points To Remember About Biotech Stocks

Biotech stocks have declined heavily in the past few weeks. Up until recently stocks in this sector reached sky-high valuations as investors were highly attracted by the ever-rising stock prices. But now investors are getting second-thoughts and are selling stocks across the sector as fear of further declines takes hold. The iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBB) which can be a proxy for the sector turned negative today. As early as July this year the fund was up by over 31%. In a short period the ETF has given up all the growth year-to-date.

From an article in Bloomberg today:

For the last five years, biotechnology and pharmaceutical stocks have surged on an assumption about the companies that invent and sell drugs for American patients: Invent amazing treatments that save lives and cure the sick, and you can charge pretty much what you want.

That thesis is under more pressure than any time in recent history, in part because of increasing scrutiny of how some drugmakers price their medicine. In the last month, media reports about price increases for therapies that have been on the market for years have caused Democratic presidential candidates to call for regulating the sector’s business practices, including what companies spend on research and how much they can charge.

Much of the criticism has focused on a few companies — like Valeant Pharmaceuticals International Inc. and Turing Pharmaceuticals AG — that have bought old drugs and raised prices to increase profits. But the pressure on stocks has spread far wider. The Nasdaq Biotechnology Index — a 143-company barometer of the industry — fell 3.8 percent Tuesday, and has been down 11 of the last 15 trading days, wiping out $150 billion in value.

“I definitely think the concern over pricing is the main cause here,” said Jeff Jonas, a portfolio manager at Gabelli Funds who helps manage about $300 million. “I don’t think any of this is going to be able to pass politically, but I don’t think the market’s focused on the next six or 18 months. I think they’re focused on the next day or what the next negative article is going to be.”

Biotech valuations have been reaching the stratosphere for some time now. Taking advantage of investors’ mania for these companies, many firms including ones with no approved drugs have gone public in recent years. In fact a few European biotech firms have also listed their equities on the US markets. The Bloomberg piece noted the following example on crazy biotech valuations:

Yet even companies far removed from the buy-and-raise business model have been hurt. Bluebird Bio Inc. is developing treatments that reprogram the immune system to attack cancers, one of the industry’s most exciting areas. After a 2013 initial public offering, it rose 10-fold to a market valuation of more than $6 billion, despite having no products on the market. Since May, it has lost half its value. A competitor, Juno Therapeutics Inc., is down 31 percent over a similar period.

Source: Cures-for-Dollars Model Comes Undone as Biotech Sinks, Oct 7, 2015, Bloomberg

Investing in the biotech sector is not the faint-hearted. Companies with promose of potential breakthoughs may fail. However even before they get any FDA approvals, investors push their stock prices very high as future earning potential seems excellent. I wrote an article about risks with biotech investing back in April this year.

Here are a few points to remember about biotech stocks. Investors should consider these points before jumping into any of the biotech stocks:

 

1. Probability of failure in drug discovery is very high. Here is an excerpt on this important factor:

According to Harvard’s Gary Pisano, even when a drug finally gets to Phase 3 trials, the probability of failure can still be as high as 50%. Pisano also found that the R&D process at biotech firms has been no better than at big pharma companies; a study in the Journal of Health Economics actually found that larger firms had better performance in drug discovery.

2. Even ground-breaking discoveries may not translate into profits for equity investors. The following chart shows what happened to the stock of the firm that mapped the Human Genome in the late 90s.

Click to enlarge
HGSI

3. Since the previous biotech bust in early 2000, over 100  Russell 3000 biotech/life sciences companies have failed thru 2014.

4. Investing in most non-established biotech companies are simply bets that they will succeed with some drug discovery, receive FDA approvals and then sell the products in the market at high prices. However that is not always the case. Even with FDA approval, if the demand is not there for their drug then the stock will collapse as shown in the example below:
FDA Approval not enough

5. Denial of FDA approval for a drug is the death knell for a biotech stock.
FDA tolreance shift

6. Most biotech companies suffer permanent damage (i.e. losing 70% or more of stock price from peak) in an anlysis of Russell 3000 companies from 1980 thru 2014.

7. Biotech firms can experience periods of depressed stock prices as trials fail or have to be rerun, with some surging when/if success eventually occurs, or when they are bought by larger companies. For example, once a biotech firm fails in a drug discovery for cancer, the stock price is highly unliekly to recover from the sharp fall.

 

8.Most biotechs do not have profits as they are still years away from being able to market their drug. So P/E ratios can be meaningless for such firms. A recent note in The Wall Street Journal indicated how the P/E ratio of around 27 for the iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF displayed by iShares on the website is incorrect since it eccludes firms making a loss, When those firms are included the ratio shoots up to over three digits.

Over 150 Biotech firms trade on the NASDAQ market. The complete list can be found here.

Disclosure: No Positions