On the Disastrous Collapse of Insuretech Industry

Entrenched industries are extremely difficult to disrupt let alone crush in the US. This is because established players have plenty of advantages over newcomers. For instance, these firms have financial strength, years or decades of data, strong networks and in some cases legal, political and regulatory protections. A classic example of where high tech startups failed to revolutionize is the auto dealership industry. During the height of the dot com mania of the late 1990s it was predicted that auto dealers would go the way of the dodo birds as many startups would make online auto buying easier and simpler for customers. However it did not turn out that way. Auto dealers not only beat their silicon startups but more recently thrived when auto prices soared. Trying to eliminate these middlemen is like someone trying to write a new constitution for the country and replace the current one.

Another industry where startups failed miserably to uproot traditional companies is the insurance industry. This includes auto, home and health. A few years ago many startups went public in this space with the hype and hope to redo this industry and be profitable as well. A recent journal article discussed the failure of insuretechs. From the piece:

In theory, few industries should be easier to shake up than insurance, which scores very low on customer satisfaction and is run by big, boring corporations set in their own ways. Data and statistics have been at its very core ever since British mathematician James Dodson created the Equitable Life Assurance Society in the 18th century.

As a result, venture capitalists love it: According to reinsurer Gallagher Re, they poured $49 billion into insurtech between 2014 and 2022. Funding fell back last year, but mostly because 2021 was wild. 

Unlike moonshots that promise air taxis or space tourism, these startups have sensible pitches. Root, which is backed by online used-car retailer Carvana, saw that the riskiness of drivers tends to be assessed through broad-brush variables such as age and occupation, leaving a gap for using telematics to assess individualized behavior, including factors such as gentle turning or not answering texts while driving.

Similarly, Hippo employs “smart home” kits to constantly monitor risks of fire, water and other damages. Lemonade uses AI and techniques from behavioral economics to fast-track all types of insurance. 

Yet the revolters have failed to storm the gates. 

Root’s business has slowed lately, a red flag for investors looking for fast-growing companies with potential economies of scale. Even more concerning is that new technologies haven’t yet proven that they are better at pricing risks: Old-school insurers still have lower claims relative to premiums than insurtech firms, though the record of the latter group is improving.

The digital age has never shown much sign of threatening insurance giants. They haven’t seen their market share eroded or even had to adapt their businesses much. Price-comparison websites may have injected some extra competition, but people haven’t fundamentally changed how they buy insurance, even as they embraced online apps to hail rides, get food delivered or go on vacation. That suggests even the takeover value of insurtech stocks may be low. 

As it turns out, incumbents had good reasons to be conservative. “20 years ago we thought distribution costs would be lower using the internet, but this is absolutely not the case: Paying Google is more expensive than paying an agent,” said Frédéric de Courtois, group deputy chief executive of French insurer Axa.

Source: Curb Your AI Enthusiasm: Just Look at the Insurtech Carnage, WSJ, June 28, 2023

The key takeaway is that investors need to be aware of the risks involved with the startups that promise to modernize an industry. It is easy to fall for the hype of silicon valley.

Of course insurance is not the only industry that needs to be redone. Other industries such as airlines, auto, rail, tax preparation, medical devices, dental, telecom, media, retail, etc. and many more needs serious competition as well. Instead of true disruptions of these industries silicon valley is more likely to promote yet another Twitter or Facebook and the like.

Referenced companies:

  • Root Inc (ROOT)
  • Lemonade Inc (LMND)
  • Hippo Holdings Inc (HIPO)
  • Oscar Health Inc (OSCR)
  • Bright Health Group Inc (BHG)
  • Clover Health Investments, Corp. (CLOV)

Disclosure: No positions

Dividend Tax Rates in Europe 2023: Chart

The tax rates on dividends paid out to shareholders by companies are generally higher in Europe than in the US. However European firms tend to have higher dividend yields than their American peers due to the dividend culture. With that said, the following chart from Tax Foundation shows the dividend tax rates in European OECD countries at the shareholder level:

Click to enlarge

Source: Dividend Tax Rates in Europe by Cristina Enache, Tax Foundation

Ireland has the highest dividend taxes at 51% followed by Denmark and the United Kingdom. Estonia and Latvia do not have dividend taxes but they charge companies a corporate tax of 20% on profits distributed to shareholders.

Greece has the lowest tax rate at 5% followed by Slovakia and Portugal.

Overall most of developed Europe have high double-digit dividend tax rates.

US investors may also want to check out Dividend Withholding Tax Rates by Country for 2023.

India’s Sensex Hits A New Record High This Year

The equity market in India reached a new peak last week with the benchmark Sensex reaching a record high of 64,768 on yesterday Friday, June 30th. It ended the day at 64,718. The index has been a tremendous run since the troughs of the Covid-19 panic in early 2020. Since then it has crossed it previous highs and continues to go higher. It remains to be seen where it ends at the end of this year.

Sensex Year-to-Date Return:

Sensex 5-Year Return:

Sensex Long-term Return:

Source: Google Finance

The index reached 50,000 in May 2021 and in Q2 this year it shot up 9.71%. Soaring stock prices have led valuations extremely high. The following chart from a recent article at Reuters shows the valuations of Sensex and its cousin Nifty relative to a few Asian peers:

Click to enlarge

Source: Indian shares hit record highs; Nifty closes a notch below 19,000, Reuters

As an emerging market caution is warranted for any new investments.

Related ETFs and ETNs:

  • WisdomTree India Earnings (EPI)
  • The iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA)
  • PowerShares India (PIN)

Disclosure: No positions

The Current US National Debt: Infographic

The US national debt (or) gross federal debt of the US has exceeded $32.0 Trillion according to an article at Peter G.Peterson Foundation. For a normal person this figure seems so huge and is difficult to comprehend with so many zeros. The below infographic puts this mountain of a debt into perspective:

Click to enlarge

Source: THE NATIONAL DEBT IS NOW MORE THAN $32 TRILLION. WHAT DOES THAT MEAN?, Peter G.Peterson Foundation

Comparing the Returns of MSCI Europe Price Index and Total Return Index: Chart

Dividends account for a substantial portion of the long-term total returns. This is especially true in countries or regions where the dividend culture exists. For instance, the S&P 500 dividend yield is currently just 1.55%. Most European countries on the other hand have dividend yields of 3% or more. The FTSE 100 for example has a dividend yield of 3.69%. Higher dividend yields means larger total returns when many years or even decades are considered due to the effect of compounding.

According to a research report by Yoichiro Kai at T.Rowe Price, dividends accounted for 46% of the total returns in Europe from 1999 to Jan, 2023 as shown in the chart below:

Click to enlarge

Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.
As of January 27, 2023.
Source: T. Rowe Price analysis using data from Bloomberg Finance L.P. (see Additional Disclosures).

Source: Tapping the Power of Global Equity Dividends, T.Rowe Price

The key takeaway is that dividends are important and investors should not focus on just growth-oriented stocks for price appreciation to earn higher long-term total returns.