The Top 100 Auto Parts Suppliers To North America 2023

Posted by on

Auto parts suppliers form a critical part of the automotive industry eco-system. Without the parts suppliers major auto makers would grind their operations to a halt. The auto parts suppliers make everything from electronic systems to seats and everything in between. The importance of the parts makers cannot be understated. For instance, airbag makers are vital to safety of passengers in any vehicle. From an investment point of view, I have always stated that parts suppliers are better than the auto makers themselves. Unlike auto makers, parts makers are not burdened with many legacy issues such as healthcare costs, pensions, etc. In addition, parts have to be replaced on a regular basis as part of maintenance and also consumers depend on new parts in times of recession as they tend to repair their cars and hold on to them longer.

With that brief intro, let’s take a look at the top 100 auto parts suppliers to North America based on sales in 2022. Canada-based Magna International (MGA) ranked as the top player followed by ZF North America and Denso International America. Lear(LEA) took the 4th spot followed by Germany-based Bosch.

Click to enlarge

Source: Diminished Value of Georgia

Semiconductor giant Nvidia (NVDA) is the only chip company in the list above and was ranked 100th.

Disclosure: ADNT, ALV, MGA and CTTAY

On The Performance of Nasdaq-100 vs. S&P 500

Posted by on

The NASDAQ-100 index represents the largest 101 non-financial companies listed on the NASDAQ exchange. It is a modified capitalization-weighted index. The S&P 500 index on the other hand is a free-float capitalization-weighted index is composed of the largest 500 companies trading on the US markets. The S&P 500 is more representative of the US economy while the NASDAQ index is heavily focused on technology. Since the tech sector has performed very well in the past few years, the NASDAQ-100 has outperformed the S&P 500 by a wide margin as shown in the chart below:

Click to enlarge

Source: NASDAQ

The following chart shows the sector composition of the NASDAQ-100:

Click to enlarge

Source: NASDAQ

The the sector breakdown of the S&P 500 index:

Source: S&P

At the end of second quarter, tech sector accounted for about 62% of the NASDAQ-100. If we add Telecommunications the weightage increases further to 66%. In the S&P 500, tech’s weightage is 28%. Even with the addition of Telecom the total comes to just 37%. Thus the high allocation of tech in the NASDAQ index is helping fuel the huge rally.

Financials account for over 12% of the S&P 500 while it has no allocation in the NASDAQ-100. The crash in bank stocks this year has adversely impacted the S&P 500 while NASDAQ-100 remains unscathed.

Consumer Discretionary has a high allocation in the NASDAQ-100 at 20%. If the US economy goes into a recession this sector is bound to get crushed. In the S&P 500 it accounts for about 10%.

Overall though NASDAQ-100 is soaring this year relative to the S&P 500, risk remains high for NASDAQ stocks. So investors need to take that into consideration when making investment decisions.

Related ETFs:

  • SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
  • Invesco QQQ Trust Series (QQQ)

Disclosure: No positions

Comparing Amtrak & Freight Railroads: Infographic

Posted by on

Amtrak is the national passenger railroad company is the US. Unlike other countries Amtrak does not own most of the tracks its trains run on. Most of the tracks are owned by the freight railroad companies. So it is not uncommon Amtrak trains and freight trains compete for the same track at the same time. Since freight companies are the owners in many cases Amtrak trains would wait for clearance of the tracks. Below is brief excerpt from Wikipedia:

Amtrak’s network includes over 500 stations along 21,400 miles (34,000 km) of track. It directly owns approximately 623 miles (1,003 km) of this track and operates an additional 132 miles of track; the remaining mileage is over rail lines owned by other railroad companies. Some track sections allow trains to run as fast as 150 mph (240 km/h).

In fiscal year 2022, Amtrak served 22.9 million passengers and had $2.1 billion in revenue, with more than 17,100 employees as of fiscal year 2021. Nearly 87,000 passengers ride more than 300 Amtrak trains daily. Nearly two-thirds of passengers come from the 10 largest metropolitan areas; 83% of passengers travel on routes shorter than 400 miles (645 km).

Source: Wikipedia

Last year I posted an infographic on the differences between Amtrak and Freight Railroads. The following is another take on the topic:

Click to enlarge

Source: AAR

Related Stocks:

  1. CSX Corp (CSX)
  2. Union Pacific(UNP)
  3. Norfolk Southern Corp(NSC)

Disclosure: Long CSX, NSC and UNP

On The US Energy Consumption Mix

Posted by on

Oil and natural gas is the largest part of the US energy consumption mix. In 2021, it accounted for 70% according to EIA data. Though renewal energy is pickup in the past few years oil and gas will continue to play a major role in years to come. EIA projects the share of oil & gas in the energy mix would still be over 60% by 2050 though renewals gain share. Renewables alone are not possible to meet America’s energy needs. The 2021 Texas Energy Crisis is a classic example of this scenario.

Click to enlarge

Source: Canada is the solution

From an investment point of view, the US is a long way from abandoning fossil fuels. Unlike some smaller countries the country and the current political system and infrastructure is not made for major adoption of renewable energy sources. Hence investors in oil and gas producers and related companies need not worry about the country becoming a renewable energy leader anytime soon.

Related ETF:

  • United States Oil ETF (USO)

Disclosure: No positions

Work Hours vs. Wage of Select Few Countries: Chart

Posted by on

Labor wages vary across countries. For the same work, the wages in a developed country is traditionally much higher than in emerging countries. Hence it is no secret that companies looking to reduce labor costs tend to move their operations to the developing world. I recently came across an interesting article titled “Which country will be the next China?” by Jason Hsu of Rayliant Global Advisors in Australia. A small excerpt from the piece:

Between a rock and a hard place

China is great at what it does, and I don’t envy companies trying to diversify their supply chains. Consider Foxconn, the ‘gold standard’ for operating factories that manufacture high-end electronics. In response to increasing geopolitical pressure, the Taiwanese firm has made several efforts to expand beyond China.

In the United States, Foxconn reached agreements in both Wisconsin and Arizona to invest many billions of dollars in manufacturing plants. And recently, Foxconn signed a partnership with Vedanta Group to manufacture components in India. But as most of my readers know, these deals have all been scaled back or cancelled altogether, including some recent drama in which Foxconn said parts of the US lacked the skills and infrastructure to launch a plant.

I don’t want to speculate too wildly about specific cases like Foxconn’s. But it’s a simple business fact that the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, and other developed countries are simply too expensive and lack sufficient labor to replace Chinese manufacturing. In addition, cultural, employment, and labor norms have hampered Chinese manufacturing attempts in Western countries. (For those who haven’t seen it, American Factory is an excellent case study.)

At the other end of the spectrum, Africa offers inexpensive labor and investment opportunities. However, the infrastructure and labor force cannot currently support high-end and value-add manufacturing.

EM is the only viable option. But as Foxconn’s efforts in India demonstrate, there are challenges even within these markets.

Source: Which country will be the next China?, FirstLinks

China has the highest hours worked per week and the lowest wages as shown in the char below. That is one major reason why China is the factory floor of the world. The second cheapest destination for labor wages is Mexico. Unions cutting deals directly with company managements and without worker representation have kept wages below.

The highest earners with lowest amount of hours worked are in Iceland, Luxembourg and Switzerland. Wages are higher in the US but the number of hours worked is also higher relative to most developed western European countries.