U.S. slips in Global Competitiveness Rankings

In the The Global Competitiveness Report 2009-2010 published by the World Economic Forum, the USA fell to number two position from first last year.The report attributes this fall to the weakening financial markets and macroeconomic stability. Switzerland topped the rankings this year.Similar to US, the UK also fell one position to 13th place this year.

“The rankings are calculated from both publicly available data and the Executive Opinion Survey, a comprehensive annual survey conducted by the World Economic Forum together with its network of Partner Institutes (leading research institutes and business organizations) in the countries covered by the Report.”

The Top 10 Competitive countries are:

Switzerland
US
Singapore
Sweden
Denmark
Finland
Germany
Japan
Canada
Netherlands

Among the developing countries India ranks 49th, Brazil 56th and China 29th.

Knowledge is Power: Will Asia Lead Global Recovery? Edition

It is the longest automated metro system in the world, complete with luxury compartments, Wi-Fi and air conditioning. But will Dubai succeed in luring sheiks out of their cars in an emirate where gasoline only costs 25 cents a liter?.Dubai’s New Metro Is Fit for a King, But Will Locals Ride It?

The Top 50 ranks the top publicly traded companies listed on the stock exchanges of the UAE, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Oman, Kuwait and Jordan, as compiled at the close of business on April 8. Top Gulf Companies 2009

GDP Fetishism – by Joseph E. Stiglitz
Striving to revive the world economy while simultaneously responding to the global climate crisis has raised a knotty question: Are statistics giving us the right “signals” about what to do? In our performance-oriented world, measurement issues have taken on increased importance. What we measure affects what we do.

No quick end to the recession
Consumer credit will hold back economy for years
Declaring the end to the economic recession in light of the sharp fall in consumer credit conjures up images of former President Bush aboard the Aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln in May 2003 declaring the end to “major combat” in Iraq.

Divining the future prosperity of Asia through tortoise shells and tea leaves of the past or market indices of the present yield equally questionable results. Talk of an Asia-led global recovery, based principally on stock-market performance and a very modest uptick in exports to China, overstates the effects of stimulus spending and the as yet unsolved restructuring challenges ahead for most of the export-oriented region.Which Way Up for Asia?

Dubai-Metro

Dubai Metro

Asia’s Top Energy Companies

The Top 250 Global Energy Companies for 2009 will be announced by Platts, the highly respected energy consultancy, in November. Some of the companies from emerging markets in Asia are expected to move up in this list compared to last year’s rankings.

Crude oil futures for October delivery traded at above $72 in the New York Mercantile Exchange yesterday. Due to rising domestic consumption and infrastructure spending, demand for energy in Asian countries will go up. As we wait for the 2009 rankings, lets take a look at the companies that made it to the list last year.

The Top 20 Energy Companies of Asia in 2008:

Top-20-Energy-Companies-Asia-2008

Source: Platts


Chinese and Indian companies dominate the above list. The two large Chinese oil companies listed in the New York Stock Exchange are CNOOC Ltd.(CEO) and PetroChina Co. Ltd. (PTR). All the other companies do not trade in the organized U.S. exchanges. Many of the Asian energy companies are still owned by the state. Hence governments have to fast-track deregulation and public listing of these companies.

Top 10 Global Food and Beverage Companies

The U.S. food giant Kraft Foods (KFT) has made a £10.2bn bid ($16.7 billion) to acquire Cadbury (CBY), the most famous confectionery company of U.K. The deal values Cadbury share at 745 pence a share.(Note:1 British Pound (£)= 100 pence)

Cadbury’s board quickly rejected the offer saying that saying that the deal undervalues the company. Some of the large shareholders including Legal and General, one of U.K.’s top investment and insurance services company, are backing the board. Shareholders want at least 800 pence a share. Now other companies such as Nestle and Hershey may join the battle for the control of Cadbury. If Kraft is successful with this takeover bid, the global food industry will be changed for ever. So what are the largest food and beverage companies in the world?

The Dow Jones Food & Beverage Titans 30 Index contains the leading companies in the global food and beverage sector. As of August 31, 2009 the index is up 14.38%. Last year when financials were down heavily, this index lost 25.85%. The top 10 components are listed below:

1.Company: Nestle S.A. (OTC: NSRGY)
Country: Switzerland
Current Yield: 3.02%

2.Company: Pepsi (PEP)
Country: USA
Average Annual Earnings Growth (5 years): 9.44%

3.Company: Coca-Cola Co.(KO)
Country: USA
Average Annual Earnings Growth (5 years): 7.08%

4.Company: Monsanto Co. (MON)
Country: USA
Current Yield: 1.29%

5.Company: Unilever N.V. (UN)
Country: The Netherlands
Current Yield: 5.11%
Average Annual Earnings Growth (5 years): 11.59%

6.Company: Diageo Plc.(DEO)
Country: USA
Current Yield: 4.57%
Average Annual Earnings Growth (5 years): 3.04%

7.Company: Kraft Foods Inc. (KFT)
Country: USA
Current Yield: 4.13%
Average Annual Earnings Growth (5 years): (8.94%)

8.Company: Unilever Plc.(UL)
Country: U.K.
Current Yield: 4.56%

9. Company: Danone S.A.(OTC:DANOY)
Country: France
Current Yield: 3.13%

10.Company: Anheuser-Busch InBev N.V.(OTC:AHBIY)
Country: Belgium
Current Yield: No regular dividends paid

Cadbury’s portfolio includes brands like Bourn Vita, Dairy Milk, Halls, Trident, etc. These brands are highly popular in many emerging countries especially in the former British colonies.Any acquirer of Cadbury is sure to benefit from its brand values.

Should the Government Cut Federal Workers’ Lavish Compensation?

The U.S. celebrates Labor Day on the first Monday of September(today) while for the rest of the world Labor Day is on May 1st. Labor Day was declared to celebrate the economic and social achievements of workers.

In the U.S. job losses totaled 2.6 million in 2008.Most of the job losses were in the private sector as companies slashed payroll in large numbers to weather the downturn. Since the recession began in December 2007, the economy has lost about 6.9 million jobs. In August the official unemployment rate stood at 9.7%.Millions of workers in the private sector have seen their jobs disappear and are now surviving with the help of unemployment benefits which has been extended many times. Some of the state and local government workers have also been laid off. However their numbers are much lower than the total private sector job losses. One of group of workers who have been shielded from the recession has been the Federal workers. Unlike the state and local governments which depend on taxes and other revenues to pay workers, the Federal government has the exclusive authority to print money. Hence despite the rising deficit that runs in the trillions, the Federal government has been able to keep their employees well paid.For Labor Day 2009 celebrations, the Department of Labor site tag line says “Good Jobs for Everyone”.

Today Federal workers enjoy much higher compensation packages relative to private sector workers. In an article titled”Federal Pay Continues Rapid Ascent” Chris Edwards of the Cato Institute analyzed the compensation levels of Federal workers using data from the The Bureau of Economic Analysis.

The article mentioned:

“The George W. Bush years were very lucrative for federal workers. In 2000, the average compensation (wages and benefits) of federal workers was 66 percent higher than the average compensation in the U.S. private sector. The new data show that average federal compensation is now more than double the average in the private sector.

In 2008, federal worker compensation averaged a remarkable $119,982, which was more than double the private sector average of $59,909. ”

Chart
Click to enlarge

Federal-workers-pay

Source: The Cato Institute

The above chart clearly shows that the federal wages are increasing year after year at an astonishing rate when compared to the stagnant to small rises in the private sector. As for the reason behind this great divergence, Chris added:

“Members of Congress who have large numbers of federal workers in their districts relentlessly push for expanding federal worker compensation. Also, the Bush administration had little interest in fiscal restraint, and it usually got rolled by the federal unions. The result has been an increasingly overpaid elite of government workers, who are insulated from the economic reality of recessions and from the tough competitive climate of the private sector.”

In addition to the prestige that goes with working for the Feds, Federal workers also enjoy very high security. In order to pay for such lavish pay and other benefits, the Feds adding more debt each year to the public debt which will be a burden on our future generations.In addition, anyone who has used the services of Federal government knows the excessive fees charged for any kind of services such as passport issuance, security charges when buying airline tickets, etc.

So how many people are employed by the Federal government?. According to the latest available data, there were 2,730,050 in 2007. These employees were paid $14,426,625,181 in December 2007 alone.

The Total Federal Government Civilian Employment 2007 by Function:

[Table=176]

Department of Homeland Security Agencies Total:

[Table=177]

Source: The Census Bureau

For the excellent pay and benefits, in the current economic environment, public sector jobs have become highly attractive to many people looking for work. With health care costs soaring every year and compensation for workers in the private sector not rising to keep up with rising costs, working for the government has become fashionable again.

The importance of the federal benefits was recently underscored by a U.S. Senator. During a townhall in Waukon, Iowa, a constituent asked Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) “Why is your insurance so much cheaper than my insurance and so better than my insurance?”. When Grassley struggled to explain the details of his own health care plan, the man followed up, “Okay, so how come I can’t have the same thing you have?” Grassley replied, “You can. Just go work for the federal government.”

In summary, my answer to the title of this article is Yes, The federal government must cut the lavish benefits and pay of its employees to match the current pay levels in the private sector. Though there may not be a political will to do this, a program to gradually reduce and eliminate some of the liberal benefits offered to federal workers has to be implemented.