World GDP Change Over The Last 500 Years

The graphic below shows the change in composition of World GDP over the last 500 years. The economy of China and India were much larger in the 16th,17th, 18th and 19th centuries than they are today.Both the economies started to shrink from the 1850s. However they are growing at an increasing pace with China’s GDP reaching 12% of global GDP in 2000 and India reaching 5%.

It is interesting to note that the U.S. economy grew dramatically from early 1800s thru 1950. As China takes a larger portion of the world’s economic growth, the US share of the global output may decline.

Click to Enlarge

World-GDP-Comparison-1500-to-now

Source: http://www.visualizingeconomics.com

Health Care Spending Comparison Across OECD Countries

Rising health spending is adding more pressure to government budgets according to a recent health data report by the OECD.

In all OECD countries health spending is rising faster than economic growth. The average ratio of health spending to GDP rose from 7.8% in 2000 to 9.0% in 2008. Growing health care costs with falling GDP growth have led to a sharp increase in the ratio of health spending to GDP in some countries such as Ireland and Spain. In Ireland it rose from 7.5% in 2007 to 8.7% in 2008 and in Spain it increased from 8.4% to 9.0%.

Health Expenditure as % of GDP

Click to Enlarge

OECD-Health-Expenditure-to-GDP

Source: OECD

Note: The dark blue color in the bar denotes public expenditure on health and the light blue color denotes private expenditure

The total U.S. spending totaled 16.0% of GDP in 2008. Half of this was public spending primarily due to Medicare, Medicaid and other social benefit programs.

Health Expenditure per Capita

OECD-Health-Expenditure-per-capita

In terms of per capita health spending, the US spent $7,538 in 2008, well over double the $3,000 average of all OECD countries. The next biggest spenders were Norway and Switzerland. Both these countries spent much less than the U.S. per capita but still some 50% more than the OECD average.

The OECD report also noted:

Governments of most OECD countries shoulder the lion’s share of healthcare costs. The share of government expenditure devoted to health increased in most countries, rising from an average of 12% in 1990 to an all-time high of 16% in 2008.  Given the urgent need to reduce their budget deficits, many OECD governments will have to make difficult choices to sustain their healthcare systems: curb the growth of public spending on health, cut spending in other areas, or raise taxes.

Growing use of medical technologies such as CT and MRI imaging are also contributing to  rising health care costs. CT and MRI scanners are expensive to buy and operate. The per capita use of these devices in the U.S.  is much higher than other OECD countries. This is primarily due to the practice of defensive treatment by doctors who fear of getting sued.  However there are concerns that some of these imaging may not to be useful to the patients.

Unnecessary medical procedures using expensive hi-tech equipment is one of the major factors of soaring healthcare costs in the U.S.  This important point is not addressed in the health care reform passed by the Obama administration. In fact the reform does not seem to achieve anything meaningful other than to require the currently uninsured millions of Americans to get insurance. The following excerpt from a news release proves that the administration is still out of touch with reality:

President Barack Obama’s new health coverage for uninsured people with health problems won’t be cheap — monthly premiums as high as $900, administration officials said.

Prices will vary by state and type of coverage from a low of $140 a month to as much as $900, said Richard Popper, deputy director of a new insurance office at the federal Health and Human Services department. Officials provided details of the plan, which starts enrolling people Thursday.

The price range is so wide because premiums will be keyed to standard individual health insurance rates in each state, which can differ dramatically because of medical costs and the scope of coverage. Independent experts estimate premiums will average around $400 to $600 a month. Younger people will pay less.

“There are going to be meaningful premiums that are going to be required to stay in this plan … in the hundreds of dollars,” said Popper, with the Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight.

Despite the cost, consumer advocates are urging uninsured people with health problems to sign up soon, because they cannot be turned away for medical reasons. Family members may be able to help with premiums.

The Pre-Existing Condition Insurance Plan will start taking applications Thursday in many states, the rest by the end of the month. Coverage will be available as early as August 1.

With falling wages, high unemployment and rising cost of living it would be interesting to see how many of the uninsured are able to afford the premiums and sign up for this government-run insurance plan.

Related: Health Care Expenditure As A Percentage Of GDP Among OECD Countries (Nov 11, 2015)

India’s Best Public, Private and Foreign Banks

The Financial Express newspaper of India published India’s Best Banks in March this year. The banks were ranked based on the following factors:

  • Strength & Soundness
  • Growth
  • Profitability
  • Efficiency
  • Credit Quality

India’s Best Banks

Click to Enlarge

Indias-best-banks-2009

HDFC Bank (HDB) took the top rank in the New Private Sector Bank category. ICICI Bank (IBN) was ranked at number four. The capital adequacy ratio was 15.69% and 15.53% for HDFC and ICICI respectively based on 2009 results.

KBW: Bank Takeover List

The investment firm KBW has published its “Takeover List” in the U.S. banking sector after a gap of about two and half years. An article in The Wall Street Journal noted some of the reasons for the expected M&A activity include:

  • A lack of earnings power
  • Tough regulation on capital and use of debt
  • More clarity on commercial real estate assets and other troubled loans on banks’ books

The takeover list is split into three categories:

  1. The KBW Potential Buyers List
  2. The KBW Potential Sellers List
  3. The KBW Potential Buyers Who Could Become Sellers List

The potential buyers include regional banks such as BB&T Corp (BBT), City National Corp (CYN), First Horizon National (FHN) and PNC Financial Services (PNC). The four “Too big to fail” super banks – Bank of America(BAC), JP Morgan Chase(JPM), Citibank(C) and Wells Fargo(WFC) are not in this list since they already at or near the regulatory limits on the share of U.S. deposits they are allowed to hold.

Of the 26 potential sellers, the following seven banks are attractive for buyers due to “a good footprint, more low-cost deposits and healthy fee-income businesses.”

  • Abington Bancorp(ABBC) of PA
  • Boston Private Financial Holdings(BPFH) of MA
  • Cardinal Financial(CFNL)  of VA
  • Encore Bancshares(EBTX)  of TX
  • Susquehanna Bancshares(SUSQ) of PA
  • Western Alliance Bancorporation(WAL) of NV
  • Wilmington Trust(WL) of DE

These potential sellers have market caps of less than about $1B.

The top banks in the “Potential Buyers Who Could Become Sellers List” are:

  • Bryn Mawr Bank (BMTC)
  • Columbia Banking System (COLB)
  • Citizens South Banking (CSBC)
  • First Financial Holdings (FFCH)
  • First Midwest Bancorp (FMBI)
  • MB Financial (MBFI)
  • PacWest Bancorp (PACW)

It must be noted that so far this year 86 banks have failed and the number of “problem banks” has reached 775 according to the FDIC. Some of the markets have way too many than needed. Hence there is plenty of room for consolidation in the highly fragmented U.S. banking industry.

11 National Oil Companies

Unlike Integrated Oil Companies (IOCs) such as BP(BP), Royal Dutch Shell (RDS.A, RDS.B), TOTAL (TOT) and others, National Oil Companies (NOCs) are majority-owned by the state. For example, the Norwegian government is the largest shareholder in Statoil (STO), the country’s largest oil company. The state owns 67% of all outstanding shares of Statoil. Some consider NOCs to be better than IOCs since the ownership interest lies with the states and they are able to use revenues from NOCs to offer many social benefits for everyone in the country.

The following 11 NOCs appeared in the PFC Energy’s Top 50 list for 2009:

1. Petro-China(PTR)
China

2. Petrobras(PBR)
Brazil

3. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.(SNP)
China

4. Gazprom (OTC: OGZPY)
Russia

5. Rosneft Oil Co
Russia

6. CNOOC (CEO)
China

7. Statoil (STO)
Norway

8. ONGC Ltd.
India

9. Ecopetrol (EC)
Colombia

10. PTT
Indonesia

11. JSC Gazprom Neft (OTC:GZPFY)
Russia