For Fantastic Returns Should Investors Dive Into Frontier Markets?

I recently came across an article on frontier markets in which Franklin Templeton’s Carlos von Hardenberg, the deputy manager of the $1.2bn Templeton Frontier Markets fund  stated that for sky-high returns investors should consider frontier markets. According to him, investors focusing on just the emerging markets for growth are missing the opportunities in frontier markets. However this trend seems to be changing with investors now more interested in frontier markets. These seems to be true based on a piece in Barron’s magazine today. More that below.

First let me summarize some of the key points mentioned by Carlos von Hardenberg:

  • Based on GDP growth, of the last world’s 10 fastest-growing countries in the world in the last decade just one of them is an emerging market. The rest are frontier markets.
  • Emerging markets are trading at a big premium compared to frontier markets. Frontier markets are trading at just 7.-5 times earnings relative to emerging markets’ 13-times earnings.
  • Frontier markets such as Nigeria are interesting. As an example, Guinness is selling more beer in Nigeria than in Ireland.

Source: How to tap into the world’s fastest-growing regions, Trustnet

From the Barron’s article Braving the Frontier Markets by Ben Levisohn:

Frontier markets are surging this year. Investors, however, should think twice before plunging headlong into stocks from countries as far-flung as Argentina, Bangladesh, Botswana, Slovakia, and Sri Lanka.

The appeal is obvious: The MSCI Frontier Markets Total Return Index has risen 8% since the start of the year, besting the MSCI Emerging Markets Total Return Index’s 0.4% return by 7.6 percentage points.

But frontier markets today are essentially what emerging markets were more than a decade ago—in both positive and negative respects. There’s the outsized growth, sure, but that comes with higher-than-average risks. Most frontier-market stocks trade infrequently, are expensive to enter and exit, and come with idiosyncratic factors that can cause markets to plunge or freeze up completely. It’s not a bet for the faint of heart—or an easy market to play. “It makes sense to have some exposure,” says David Romhilt, head of manager research for the Americas at Barclays in New York. “But there are real risks in the space.”

FRONTIER MARKETS HAVE A lot to recommend them. HSBC strategist John Lomax points to their high expected-growth rates and hefty dividends, which average about 5%, compared with just a 2.7% yield in emerging markets. Even better, frontier markets generally outperform emerging markets as investors feel comfortable heading for the more remote reaches of the world’s stock markets—which would be right about now.

So should investors simply dive into frontier market stocks with now?

The answer to the above question is an absolute no. Frontier markets are in general not for the faint-hearted. For example, the MSCI Frontier Markets Index fell over 67% during the global financial crisis. The benchmark indices of many individual countries fell even more.  The 5-year and 10-year return of this index are -13.07% and 6.08% respectively.

Frontier stocks are especially not worth the effort for retail investors. Investing directly in individual frontier market stocks is an extremely ill-risky proposition due to some of the reasons mentioned in the Barron’s article above. However this does not mean individual investors should stay clear of those markets. In order to profit from the growth in those markets one can assign a small portion of their portfolio’s assets to these markets. The actual percentage of allocation that one can allocate depends on a variety of factors such as portfolio size, goal, age, investment horizon of an investor. Some investors should simply avoid frontier markets at all costs. An example of such investor would be an average senior citizen depending on dividend income from a moderate-size portfolio.

If an investor is able to take the risk, the best way to gain exposure to frontier markets is via ETF. Some of the ETFs to access these markets are listed below:

Guggenheim Frontier Markets ETF (FRN)
iShares MSCI Frontier 100 Index (FM)
Market Vectors Africa Index ETF (AFK)
Market Vectors Gulf States (MES)
PowerShares MENA Frontier Countries ETF (PMNA)

Stock picking has become less attractive in the recent years after investors have been hit with one crisis after another. The dot-com implosion, the global financial crisis, the European soverign debt crisis, the Greek crisis, the Enron, Wamu, CountryWide frauds and uncovered frauds at money other companies have made stock picking a futile and losing exercise for retail investors. However stock picking can still pay off big if an investor is able to select stocks with thorough research. The stock picking strategy works extremely well in frontier markets according to an article in the latest issue of Bloomberg BusinessWeek.

From “Frontier Markets: Where Picking Stocks Is Paying Off“:

Fund managers who focus on the world’s least-developed markets are trouncing their benchmark index—something most investors routinely fail to do. Mark Mobius’s Templeton Frontier Markets Fund and 12 similar funds investing in countries from Vietnam to Nigeria and Romania earned an average 24 percent last year, topping the 8.4 percent gain in the MSCI Frontier Markets Index. Their edge comes from uncovering undervalued stocks in markets where there aren’t crowds of well-informed investors. “The companies are overlooked and under-owned,” says Carlos von Hardenberg, an Istanbul-based money manager at Franklin Templeton Investments who helped the firm’s $1.3 billion Frontier Markets Fund (TFMAX) post a 24 percent gain last year.

The lack of information about frontier market companies creates opportunities for managers who do on-the-ground research. “Sometimes companies wonder why I’m there—they’ve never had a foreign investor visit before,” says Stephen Mack, who manages the Frontaura Global Frontier Fund, which returned about 18 percent in 2012. “You’ve just got to do the legwork.”

Top-Countries-in-MSCI-Frontier-Market-Index

 

Disclosure: No Positions

Sovereign Debt Holdings by Select Banking Systems

Japan has the highest debt to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in the developed world. Late last year, Japan’s sovereign debt exceeded over 200% of the GDP. At that time, the OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurria commented that Japan’s debt load was in “Uncharted Territory”.

However unlike most countries in the developed world, 90% of Japanese government debt is held by domestic investors. In fact, more than 40% of  all government bonds are held by Japanese banks according to “Financial Stability Report” published by The Bank of England.

Click to enlarge

Soverign-Debt-Holdings-of-Banking-Systems

Via  The Absolute Return Letter , February 2013,  Absolute Return Partners

The combined holdings of Japanese government bonds by domestic banks is equal to 9 times of their tier 1 capital. While it can be argues that this is a disaster waiting to happen it is also true that the country’s economy remains stable and is not susceptible to the tyranny of global capital as foreign investors do not hold most of Japan’s public debt. With one of the highest savings rate in the world and most of the public debt held by domestic investors, the Japanese economy remained stable even during the global financial crisis and has started to expand under the leadership of new Prime Minster Shinzo Abe.

Related ETFs:

iShares MSCI Japan Index (EWJ)

Disclosure: No Positions

How to Profit From Rising U.S. Coal Exports

According to an article in The Wall Street Journal recently, U.S, exports of coal continues to soar. Last year 120 million tons of black gold was exported compared to about half of that amount in 2009. The following chart shows the gradual increase in coal exports:

Click to enlarge

US-Coal-Exports-by-Year

Two interesting facts from the article:

  • Contrary to popular beliefs coal is not being exported to emerging markets such as India and China but rather to Europe especially the UK, The Netherlands and Italy where coal-powered power plants are having a resurgence.
  • Unlike in the past when metallurgical coal used to exported, now steam coal which is used in power plants is being exported.

Source:  U.S. Coal Finds Warm Embrace Overseas, The Wall Street Journal

From the U.S. EIA site:

The United States holds the world’s largest estimated recoverable reserves of coal and is a net exporter of coal. In 2011, our nation’s coal mines produced more than a billion short tons of coal, and more than 90% of this coal was used by U.S. power plants to generate electricity. While coal has been the largest source of electricity generation for over 60 years, its annual share of generation declined from 49% in 2007 to 42% in 2011 as some power producers switched to lower-priced natural gas.

U.S. coal production has also increased since 1950 as shown in the chart below:

US-coal_production_consumption_exports

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration

U.S. net exports has slow increased in the past few years.

Some of the top coal producers are  Peabody Energy Inc(BTU), Arch Coal Inc (ACI) and Alpha Natural Resources Inc (ANR). One way to profit from the rising coal exports is not invest in coal producers but to invest in railroads that transport coal from coal producing regions to export terminals and power plants as noted in my previous article here.

Related ETF:

Market Vectors-Coal ETF (KOL)

Disclosure: No Positions

Why Invest in Railroad Stocks

The U.S. railroad industry is one of the key pillars of the economy. Railroads are highly efficient and help move goods from one point to another cheaply and efficiently.

1869-Golden_Spike

 Joining tracks of Central Pacific Railroad and Union Pacific Railroad to complete the transcontinental railroad at Promontory, Utah May 10, 1869

Some of the reasons to invest in railroad stocks are listed below:

  • The railroad industry is a oligopoly as shown in the chart here.
  • Railroads are the best form of transportation to transport natural resources such as coal, minerals, timber, etc.
  • Other goods such as autos and petroleum products are also moved by rail in increasing quantities.
  • Railroads have pricing power since in many places only one railroad serves the area. For example, a former in Iowa may not have options to move his produce other than one single railroad serving his rural community.
  • Automation and continued investments in technology and innovation makes the industry highly efficient.
  • Railroads move goods economically across the vast distances of the country.
  • The majority of the U.S. railroads are involved in freight transportation and not on passenger traffic.

Five railroad stocks are listed below with their current yields:

1.Company: CSX Corp (CSX)
Current Dividend Yield: 2.59%

2.Company: Kansas City Southern (KSU)
Current Dividend Yield: 0.92%

3.Company: Norfolk Southern Corp (NSC)
Current Dividend Yield: 2.91%

4.Company: Union Pacific Corp (UNP)
Current Dividend Yield: 2.09%

5.Company: Providence and Worcester Railroad Co (PWX)
Current Dividend Yield: 0.99%

Note: Dividend yields noted are as of Feb 5, 2013

Disclosure: Long NSC and CSX

Will BRICs Outperform U.S. Markets In This Decade?

Economist Jim O’Neill of Goldman Sachs coined the term “BRICs” in November 2001 to identify the core set of emerging markets at that time. These countries – Brazil, Russia, India and China – did not have many things in common other than all being emerging countries. For example, in terms of political systems Brazil and India follow democracy, China follows communism with a capitalist economic system and Russia is not yet democratic though it claims to be a democracy. Similarly Brazil and Russia are rich in many natural resources while China and India have limited natural resources and import most of the commodities needed for growth. Population wise, China and India have two of the world’s largest populations while Brazil and Russia’s population is relatively small.

Despite all the differences between these countries, the BRIC markets took off from 2001. From an article in the FT beyondbrics blog:

In investment terms, it paid off spectacularly. In the ten years since O’Neill launched the Brics in November 2001, the MSCI indices for the four Brics all comfortably outperformed the S&P 500. An investment of $100 in each of the four Brics,would have been worth $674 in Brazil, $451 in China, $459 in India and $414 in Russia. An investment in the S&P500 over the same years would have made just $112. See chart below.

Click to enlarge

MSCI_Bric_SP_from-2001

Source: Goodbye Mr Bric, FT beyondbrcis

However the BRICs have lagged the S&P 500 in recent years as shown in the chart below:

SP500-vs-Bric-Indices-Best

Source: Yahoo Finance

Brazil’s Bovespa index is in the negative territory so far this year compared to the other BRIC benchmark indices and the S&P 500. It remains to be seen if the BRICs will outperform the S&P 500 this decade. Global investors will be eagerly watching the performance of the BRICs as their economies continue to expand although at a slower pace than before.

Related ETFs:

iShares MSCI Brazil Index (EWZ)
Market Vectors Russia ETF (RSX)
iShares FTSE/Xinhua China 25 Index Fund (FXI)
PowerShares India (PIN)
iShares S&P India Nifty 50 (INDY)

Disclosure: No Positions