Average Investors Underperform Most Asset Classes

The enemy of the average individual investor is no one but himself. The average investor underperforms over almost every other asset class in terms of returns over the long run. This is because investors get distracted by a variety of things that are detrimental to their returns. Some of the things that retail investors do that reduces their returns include:

  • Market Timing
  • Chasing Returns
  • Trading often
  • Worrying about things beyond his control – such as Trump’s tweets, Trade Wars, politics in general
  • Hot stocks or sectors such as Real Estate, Technology, Biotechs, etc. – in general whatever seems to be “hot” at the moment
  • IPOs
  • Failing to have a goal
  • Brexit drama
  • Unable to control emotions

Of course, these are just a few factors. There are millions of other factors that adversely affect an investor’s return.

The following chart shows how poorly an average investor under-performed (shown in red) over the past 20 years when compared to other asset classes:

Click to enlarge

Source: Insights, July 2019, Richard Bernstein Advisors LLC

An excerpt from the above piece:

Trying to time their investments and ultimately buying high and selling low has effectively ruined investment performance. Chart 1 quantifies “ruined”. Investors underperformed nearly every category. Only Telecom Services and Commodities performed worse than individual investors over the past 20 years. Investors even slightly underperformed cash during the past 20 years, meaning hey would have performed better if they had simply left their money in a money market account for the full 20 years! (emphasis mine)

Perhaps most important, individual investors didn’t outperform inflation (i.e., they had negative real returns). So, not only did investors underperform just about every asset class and sub-class by trying to time investments, but they also lost the purchasing power of their savings. In other words, they made themselves poorer.

This is indeed shocking. In their attempt to beat the market or even multiply their money many times over, investors lose.

Over the 10-year period also average investors’ returns are poor relative to other asset classes as shown in the chart below:

Related ETFs:

  • SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
  • S&P MidCap 400 SPDR ETF (MDY)
  • SPDR Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY)
  • SPDR Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLP)
  • SPDR Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLE)
  • SPDR Financials Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF)
  • iShares Dow Jones Select Dividend ETF (DVY)
  • SPDR S&P Dividend ETF (SDY)
  • Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG)

Disclosure: No Positions

 

Eleven Drawdowns Over The Past Eighty Years: Table

US equity markets have turned extremely volatile since June is year. Fears of recession up until a few ago has been overtaken by positive developments or hints of progress in the trade dispute with China. In addition, Brexit and other chaos adds more uncertainties to the global equity markets. Even if the market stabilizes and continues to move higher it is always wise to be vigilant of the downside risks. Severe declines of 40% or more have become more common in recent crashes according to a report by Manning & Napier.

The following table shows the major drawdowns in the past 80 years:

Click to enlarge

 

Source: HOW INVESTORS SHOULD HANDLE MARKET SELLOFFS by Dana Vosburgh, Manning & Napier

Interesting WSJ Article on What Americans Can Learn From The French On Free Markets

“Competition is a sin”  – John D. Rockefeller

The fundamental principle of capitalism is the belief in free markets and competition. In a free market economy, competition is encourage and market participants compete against one another for the benefit of all. In such an economy, the state ensures that no one company monopolies an industry or a group of companies form a cartel to set prices as they wish.

In the US, competition has become a dirty word in many industries as companies try to maintain monopoly or oligopoly power and drive out competition. In fact, the ever growing power of these dominant players in the economy has led to point where competition is virtually non-existent and American consumers suffer. While the US economy becomes more and more concentrated with a handful of firms in each industry, other countries have encouraged competition by embracing the ideals of free markets. According to an article in the journal today, France has a thriving free market in some industries hugely benefiting consumers and the economy.

Below is an excerpt from the piece:

Mr. Philippon reviews much of this evidence and concludes competition has indeed declined to the detriment of consumers. His novel contribution, though, is to contrast this with the experience of Europe. Indeed, he was inspired by a mundane question many European visitors ask: “Why on earth are U.S. cellphone plans so expensive?”

The answer is competition. In 2011, the French on average paid 17% more than Americans for telecommunication services in dollar terms. In 2014, they paid 27% less. What happened? In 2011 France granted a 4G cellphone license to French billionaire Xavier Niel ’s Free Mobile which then offered unlimited talk, text, and data, all for a fraction of what incumbents charged. Free Mobile soon captured 20% of the market and incumbents have cut prices to compete.

By contrast, the cellphone market in the U.S. is highly concentrated and about to get more so after the Justice Department said the third largest carrier, T-Mobile USA Inc., could merge with the fourthSprint Corp.

A similar dynamic has unfolded in airlines. Until 2007, Air France had a near monopoly on domestic flights. The next year French reformers allowed Britain’s low-cost EasyJet to enter the market. Low-cost airlines including Transavia, Hop and Vueling now supply a third of domestic flights and half of flights to other European Union countries. By contrast, a wave of mergers has left American skies dominated by four major carriers with foreign carriers barred from competing on domestic routes. U.S. airlines are now far more profitable than their European counterparts.

Americans may struggle to get their head around the idea of France as a champion of free markets. Indeed, Americans routinely get the EU backward. It’s caricatured as “an overreaching bureaucratic beast,” Mr. Philippon writes, a view that often reflects “ignorance or laziness.” What this caricature misses is that many interventions by Brussels, including those that infuriate Brexiteers, are designed to level the playing field across the region and increase competition.

Source: What France—Yes, France—Can Teach the U.S. About Free Markets, WSJ, Sept 4, 2019

The full article is worth a read.

In addition to Airlines, Telecom and mobile carriers below are some of the industries that are heavily concentrated:

  • Railroads – For freight (Oligopoly)
  • Railroads – For long-distance passenger rail (Monopoly)
  • Hospitals
  • Health insurance
  • Media
  • Cable TV
  • Internet providers
  • Entertainment
  • Rating agencies
  • Long distance bus services
  • Courier services

In summary, many would agree that the in-famous robber barons of the 19th century has been replaced by oligopolies in the 21st century. So unless changes are made, eventually each industry may be represented by only one company leading to a situation which will look similar to communist economies…..

U.S. Business Expansions Since World War II: Chart

The chart shows the many periods of business expansions in the US since World War II. The current expansion that began during the depths of the GFC in 2009 is one of the longest on record lasting over 100 months. The previous long bull market was during the golden age of hi-tech from 1991 to 2001 when all things technology including dot coms were hot.

Click to enlarge

Source: Lord Abbett