Are U.S. Stocks Overvalued Now?

The U.S. equity market is one of the best performing market among developed countries so far this year. For example, the S&P 500 is up by 14.35% on price return basis and 15.37% on total return basis year-to-date. Financials have skyrocketed with the sector in the index up by over 20%. Healthcare and Consumer Discretionary sectors also have had a great with a return of 20% or closer to that. Telecoms and Utilities, usually considered as income plays for their slow and steady growth with high dividend payouts, are lagging the overall performance of the market.

Financials were the hardest hit during the global financial crisis. Less than a few years later their strong performance is surprising. As the market sentiment has improved stocks are continuing to soar higher confounding skeptics by ignoring negative news and focusing more on positive news and company-specific events. As a result many investors are wondering if U.S. stocks are overvalued now after the double digit gains in less than six months.

According to a report by Peter Buchanan of CIBC World Markets, U.S. stocks are not yet overvalued at least based on one measure. He states that the the ratio of stock market capitalization to GDP is still lower relative to two earlier highs.

This ratio shows the percentage of GDP that represents stock market value. It can be used to identify if a  market is overvalued or undervalued. Any figure over 100% is considered as U.S. market being overvalued and a figure of around 50% is said to show that the market is undervalued. It should be noted however that this metric does not always work perfectly. For example, in 2000 it stood at 153% implying that the market was overvalued. Later the markets crashed. But in 2003 it was at around 130% and instead of falling, stocks went to reach all-time highs. So this measure must be used with caution.

From the CIBC report:

Click to enlarge

US-Stock-Market-Cap-to-GDP-Ratio

Beyond the raft of conventional metrics trotted out by analysts, like forward and Shiller trailing PEs, one interesting metric is the ratio of stock market capitalization to GDP. Publicly listed corporations play a greater role in the economy than they once did. Many listed corporations do more of their business overseas than in the past, and interest rates are also lower. While that complicates longer term comparisons, data for shorter intervals can still convey useful information. At 97%, that ratio today is still some ways from its highpoint of the last two cycles.

Source: Are Abenomics Benefits in Abeyance?, The Week Ahead, June 3-7, 2013, CIBC World Markets

Investors willing to bet on further rise in U.S. stock prices can consider some of the companies listed below:

1.Company: Cullen/Frost Bankers Inc (CFR)
Current Dividend Yield: 3.11%
Sector: Banking

2.Company: T. Rowe Price Group Inc (TROW)
Current Dividend Yield: 2.00%
Sector:Capital Markets

3.Company:Consolidated Edison Inc (ED)
Current Dividend Yield: 4.31%
Sector:Multi-Utilities

4.Company:Airgas Inc (ARG)
Current Dividend Yield: 1.87%
Sector: Chemicals

5.Company:The Clorox Co (CLX)
Current Dividend Yield: 3.42%
Sector:Household Products

6.Company:PPG Industries Inc (PPG)
Current Dividend Yield: 1.59%
Sector: Chemicals

7.Company: Kellogg Co (K)
Current Dividend Yield: 2.84%
Sector:Food Products

8.Company: Quest Diagnostics Inc (DGX)
Current Dividend Yield: 1.94%
Sector:Health Care Providers & Services

9.Company:Ametek Inc (AME)
Current Dividend Yield: 0.56%
Sector:Electrical Equipment

10.Company: Church & Dwight Co Inc (CHD)
Current Dividend Yield: 1.84%
Sector:Household Products

Note: Dividend yields noted are as of May 31, 2013. Data is known to be accurate from sources used.Please use your own due diligence before making any investment decisions.

Disclosure: No Positions

A Comparison of S&P 500 and S&P/TSX Composite Indices

The S&P 500 Index is the best representation of large cap U.S. companies. The index was first published in 1957  and the components in the index capture 75% coverage of all U.S. stocks. The S&P 500 is the widely followed barometer of the U.S. equity markets.

The S&P/TSX Composite Index is the benchmark index of the Canadian equity market.This index provides coverage for 95% of the Canadian market.A total of 239 companies are in the index.

The following charts show the composition of the indices:

1) S&P 500 Index (as of May 31, 2013):

Click to enlarge

SP500-Index-Composition-may-2013

2) S&P/TSX Composite Index (as of October 31, 2011):

SPTSX-Composite-Index-Composition

The Top 10 Constituents of S&P 500 Index:

S.No.ConstiuentTickerSector
1Apple Inc.AAPLInformation Technology
2Exxon Mobil CorpXOMEnergy
3Microsoft CorpMSFTInformation Technology
4General Electric CoGEIndustrials
5Chevron CorpCVXEnergy
6Johnson & JohnsonJNJHealth Care
7Google IncGOOGInformation Technology
8International Business Machines CorpIBMInformation Technology
9Procter & GamblePGConsumer Staples
10JP Morgan Chase & CoJPMFinancials

The Top 10 Constituents of S&P/TSX Composite Index:

S.No.ConstiuentTickerSector
1Royal Bank of CanadaRYFinancials
2Toronto-Dominion BankTDFinancials
3Bank of Nova Scotia HalifaxBNSFinancials
4Suncor Energy IncSUEnergy
5Canadian National RailwaysCNIIndustrials
6Barrick Gold CorpABXMaterials
7Bank of MontrealBMOFinancials
8Potash Corp of SaskatchewanPOTMaterials
9Canadian Natural ResourcesCNQEnergy
10BCE IncBCETelecommunication Services

 

Source: Standard & Poor’s

As a resource-based economy, Canada’s benchmark index is concentrated with financials, energy and materials. These three sectors account for about 79% of the index with energy and materials alone having a weightage of about 50%. In the S&P 500, financials account for about 17% while materials and energy make up less than 15% of the index.

Among the top 10 constituents, the TSX Composite is dominated by companies in the above three sectors with the exception of one firm (Canadian National) from the industrial sector. In the S&P 500, just two companies from the energy sector are in the top 10. The presence of four IT firms shows the importance of the industry for the U.S. economy.

Related ETFs:

  • SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
  • iShares MSCI Canada Index (EWC)

Disclosure: Long BMO, BNS, CNI, TD and RY

The Digital Revolution is Destroying Jobs

Technological advancements made possible by computer is destroying jobs faster than creating them according to a study by economists Andrew McAfee and Erik Brynjolfsso of MIT. Many scholars are now warning that this revolution is different unlike past warnings of destruction of jobs due to technological innovations that have proved exaggerated.

From Man vs. Machine: Are Any Jobs Safe from Innovation? by Thomas Schultz in Der Spiegel:

The worldwide application of computer technology has become so much more cost-effective and efficient that people are no longer only replaceable in certain sectors — autoworkers on assembly lines, for instance — but in entire occupational areas. Cashiers are being replaced by self-service check-out lines, airline employees by self check-in kiosks, financial traders by algorithms and travel agencies by online travel sites.

This development has been apparent for roughly a decade. But, says McAfee: “You ain’t seen nothing yet. Looking ahead to what technology is going to do over the next five to 10 years, I’m really concerned.”

In addition to the ongoing turmoil from the financial crisis, Western economies may have to face “tectonic shifts in employment,” the economists warn — and Asian countries won’t be able to escape this development, either. In the battle between man and machine, many workers in Chinese production plants will also lose out.

Fresh Causes for Concern

Fears of the impact of technical progress are nothing new. Back in 1930, renowned British economist John Maynard Keynes warned of a “new disease” that he dubbed “technological unemployment.” Nonetheless, the world’s economies and their labor markets have always managed to swiftly adapt to even major changes and, ultimately, more jobs were created in new industries than were lost in obsolete ones.

Why should this be any different for the digital revolution, which has produced global technology giants, such as Microsoft and Google, over the past couple of decades and created countless new jobs around the world?

It goes without saying that advances in computer technology have generated millions of new jobs around the globe, more than any other economic sector, says McAfee. But he hastens to add that, at the same time, this very progress could wipe out even more jobs in other areas of the economy.

The two MIT professors are not the only ones issuing such warnings. Politicians and economists of all ideological stripes have similar concerns, and current unemployment figures from early April appear to confirm these fears. Despite the current positive economic climate and rising consumer confidence, far fewer jobs have been created than expected.

“Can innovation and progress really hurt large numbers of workers, maybe even workers in general?” asked Nobel laureate and economist Paul Krugman, for example, in his column for the New York Times last December. “I often encounter assertions that this can’t happen,” Krugman wrote. “But the truth is that it can.”

US-Econ-Performance-vs-Worker-productivty

The 2000s were the first decade since the Great Depression to end with a net loss in jobs despite the fact that per capita gross domestic product (GDP) in the US is one-third higher than it was 20 years ago — and the country produces 75 percent more goods than it did back then.

Automation is decimating jobs in developed economies. When outsourcing and offshoring of jobs are taken into account jobs are scarce in most of the developed world especially in the Eurozone countries. The chart below shows the latest seasonally-adjusted unemployment rates in the EU:

Click to enlarge

EU-Unemployment-rates-April-2013

Source: Eurostat

In Spain and Greece the unemployment rate now stands at over 25%. In the U.S. such high rates were last seen during the Great Depression. Countries such as France, Italy, Ireland and Portugal have unemployment rates in excess of 11%. In many European countries the rate for youth is much higher.

In the U.S, the unemployment rate stood at 7.5% in April down from 7.6 % in March. The employment situation has considerably improved from April 2012 when the rate was 8.1%. According to official figures, the total number of unemployed Americans was 11.7 million in April. The real numbers are much higher.

Unless policy makers implement effective policies to reinvigorate the job market, high unemployment rates will be the “new normal” in advanced countries for years to come.

Are International Utilities Attractive Relative To Their U.S. Peers?

Stocks in the U.S. utility sector are lagging the performance of the overall market so far this year. While the utilities was performing up until recently, last month they fell heavily. The proxy for sector, the SPDR Utilities Select Sector (XLU) was down 8.5% just in last month through the 30th and is up only about 6.0% year-to-date compared to S&P 500’s rise of 14.3% . According to an article in The Wall Street Journal utilities are down for two reasons.

From the Journal article:

Generally slow-but-steady, utility stocks once held strong appeal because of their high dividend payouts and sturdy performance. But rising optimism about the pace of economic growth is prompting ETF investors to move into sectors more closely tied to growth, like technology and industrials.

Others are bailing on utilities because bond yields are rising on speculation that the Federal Reserve might pare back its monthly asset-purchase program. The promise for high payouts from bonds reduces the need to squeeze income from utility stocks, investors say.

While investors are fleeing U.S. utility stocks they may want to consider investing in international utilities. European utility stocks which were on a downward trend for a few years seems to have turned a corner. For example, in the past 5 years, the STOXX® Europe 600 Utilities was down by over 46% but so far this year it is up about 2% excluding dividends.

The  SPDR S&P International Utilities Sector ETF (IPU) tracks the performance of the utilities in developed countries excluding the U.S.  The fund is up by 1.72% year-to-date based on price only. This fund can also be considered somewhat as a proxy for European utilities since the majority of the fund’s assets are invested in utility companies of Europe.

5-year chart comparing the performance of XLU and IPU:

Click to enlarge

XLU-vs-IPU-5-Years

1-year chart comparing the performance of XLU and IPU:

Click to enlarge

XLU-vs-IPU-1-Year

Source: Yahoo Finance

I have used the 1-year chart for comparison instead of year-to-date chart to show the improvement in the international utilities ETF.

The table below shows some of the metrics of the two ETFs:

MetricSPDR Utilities Select Sector (XLU)SPDR S&P International Utilities Sector ETF (IPU) 
Total Net Assets$5.7 Billion$28.8 Million
Dividend Yield3.83%4.06%
Number of Holdings33105
Distribution FrequencyQuarterlyQuarterly

 

Source: SPDRs

Compared to the ETF for U.S. utilities, the SPDR S&P International Utilities Sector ETF (IPU) has a tiny asset base of over $28.0 million. About 38% of the assets are invested in two countries – the UK and Japan. The top three holdings in the fund are National Grid (NGG) of UK, Germany’s E.ON SE  (EONGY) and GDF Suez SA (GDFZY) of France.

Since international utilities have lagged their U.S. peers for many years and U.S. economic recovery may actually hurt utility stocks investors can consider adding selective foreign utility stocks at current levels.

Disclosure: Long EONGY

Update:

May-Sector-ReturnsSource: Why dividend yield stocks are getting dumped, MarketWatch