Current vs. Pre-Crisis Yields of Select Assets: Chart

Yields on various asset classes such as cash, bonds have declined significantly in the past few years especially in the developed world. For example, cash hardly earns any interest today in the US compared to around 3% average before the global financial crisis. For investors willing to take risk, local emerging market bonds are attractive at current levels according to an article by Richard Turnill of Blackrock.

Click to enlarge

007407A_BII_chart_email_V3

Source: Position for the macroeconomic shift ahead, Blackrock, Oct 3, 2016

In the Long Term Stocks Beat Cash: A British Example

Stocks usually tend to outperform cash and other asset types over the long-term measured in 5 years or more. The performance gap between stocks and cash over decades is even more wider due to the effect of compounding returns due to dividend reinvestment.

While holding cash in a savings account offers safety and peace of mind, cash is not the best vehicle to build wealth. The following chart from Fidelity UK shows the 30 year returns of stocks vs. cash:

Click to enlarge

stocks-beat-cash-in-long-term-returns

Source: Why long-term investing works: How putting £10K into the stock market would have earned you £90K more than cash savings over three decades, This is Money

An initial investment of  £10,000 in 1986 in the benchmark FTSE 100 would have grown to £126,867 based on total return which includes dividend reinvestment. The same amount in FTSE 100 would be worth £121,466. An investment of the same 10K in the FTSE 250 would have grown to £265,035 in the past 30 years.

Had an investor stashed the cash in a savings account, the investment would have grown to only £28,196.

Hence they key to success equity investing is to hold high-quality stocks for many years and do not panic and sell when markets turn volatile. Selling out during panics such as the recent Brexit drama is not a wise move.

Defensive Stocks’ Dividend Growth May Not Be Sustainable Moving Forward ?

Stocks in the consumer staples sector have elevated P/E ratios today relative to the market. This is because investors looking for safety and reliable income stream have piled into these stocks over the past few years. Market volatility and ultra-low interest rates only added more fuel to the solid rise of consumer staples stocks. Companies in the sector have rewarded investors year over year with decent dividend growth. However such raises may be unsustainable in the future according to David Jane of Milton Asset Management of UK.

From a recent article at Citywire, UK:

As the table below shows, over the past five years these companies have delivered nearly 10% annual dividend growth.

That looked impressive, said Jane, but had not been driven by rising sales in emerging markets, as many investors believed, because sales growth has been near zero for most of the groups.

Nor had higher dividends been driven by improved profitability, as gross profits (earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation or ebitada) had grown less than 2% a year.

‘What has been happening is debt has been growing to fund acquisitions and share buybacks, while interest costs have been falling as rates go ever lower,’ said Jane.

‘In fact, debt for the group has grown at over 8% per annum while shares outstanding have fallen and hence, earnings per share have been growing rapidly.’

He added: ‘So, the dividend growth we have seen has largely been driven by financial engineering not a fundamentally attractive business model.’

Consumer group debts have risen with dividends

Company Dividend yield % Dividend growth (5yr) % Sales growth % Gross profits (ebitda) growth (5yr) % Debt growth (5yr) % Debt / /Ebitda
Coca-Cola (KO.N) 3.22 8.37 -1.92 -1.97 13.55 2.22
Procter & Gamble (PG.N) 0.03 5.76 -4.88 -3.63 -0.90 1.04
Diageo (DGE) 2.91 7.94 1.79 5.24 4.33 2.68
Altria Group (MO.N) 3.70 8.26 4.21 12.64 1.16 1.35
British American Tobacco (BATS) 3.44 5.53 -2.01 -3.54 10.65 3.71
SABMiller (SAB) 2.35 12.52 -0.76 -1.88 6.77 2.26
Anheuser-Busch (ABI.BR) 3.10 34.69 1.58 0.81 1.96 2.89
Philip Morris (PM.N) 4.16 9.77 -4.19 -5.80 11.53 2.42
Pepsico (PEP.N) 2.86 7.90 -1.72 0.63 5.98 2.09
Reynolds American (RAI.N) 3.75 9.80 7.89 18.65 33.59 1.23
Unilever (ULVR) 0.03 5.36 3.15 3.23 9.89 1.40
Imperial Brands (IMB) 4.03 10.51 -1.60 0.61 6.53 4.33
Colgate-Palmolive (CL.N) 2.16 6.77 -1.61 -0.34 13.93 1.69
Reckitt Benckiser (RB) 2.00 4.13 0.04 -5.63 -1.75 0.79
Heineken (HEIN.AS) 1.70 11.52 3.89 7.23 7.43 2.69
Average 3.25 9.77 0.44 1.84 8.41 2.14

Source: Miton Group

Source: Why ‘expensive defensives’ are running out of road, CityWire UK, Sept 26, 2016

Caution is warranted with picking up consumer staples at current levels. Instead of simply buying these companies for the dividend yield and dividend growth, investors should aim for total return over many years. So investors can wait to add when prices decline. Buying even at 10% lower rate would generate higher total returns if held for the long-term.

Another report titled The Elevated Risks of Safe Stocks by Charles Roth at Thornburg Investment Management also discussed about expensive defensives. From the report:

Traditionally safe, dividend-paying stocks have attracted tremendous investor inflows, raising their share prices and valuation multiples to levels that aren’t supported by earnings growth. The risks of a correction in the “expensive defensives” are running increasingly high, especially as the specter of benchmark interest rate hikes grows.

Executive Summary
• Unprecedented monetary easing and asset purchases by major central banks have pushed yield-seeking investors into dividend-paying stocks, driving up their valuations.
• Earnings growth in the defensive sectors hasn’t supported the expansion in their valuation multiples. The technical flows have been reinforced by the predominant capitalization weighting model in passive investing, which at its essence becomes a momentum trade.
• Risks of a correction are growing, particularly in the U.S., where defensive stocks could be hit if the U.S. Federal Reserve hikes rates sooner than later, as some Fed officials are publicly advocating.

In the US sales are down for consumer staples companies but the P/E continues to grow higher.

Click to enlarge

us-consumer-staples-sales-vs-pe-ratio

Similar situation exists with international consumer staples also.

international-consumer-staples-sales-vs-pe-ratio

Source: The Elevated Risks of Safe Stocks by Charles Roth, Thornburg Investment Management, Sept 2016

Disclosure: Long Reckitt Benckiser (RBGLY)

Why European Equities Are Lagging in Performance Compared to their US Peers

European equities are currently at a discount to their US peers.In the past, whenever  this scenario occurred European stocks have played catch and have eliminated this discount as investors gobbled up shares that were undervalued. However that is not the case in the past few years.European stocks continue -to lag US stocks for a number of reasons. Even though the EU is a single market, each individual country has its own issues including political and economic problems. For example, up until a while ago sovereign risks dominated the headlines with countries like Greece on the verge of economic collapse.That risk declined after multi-year multiple bailouts. It seemed like Europe was finally getting back on track. But then the usually calm UK erupted in chaos with the Brexit vote.Today banking issues in Germany and Italy have come to the forefront of economic issues facing the continent. With all the never-ending issues it seems like it will take a few decades or even a century for Europeans to solve their issues.

According to a report by Schroder’s political risk is weighing heavily on European stocks and as a result investors are demanding a bigger discount. In addition to the political risks, other issues like banking industry problems and deflationary risks are well known and are already priced in. It is indeed surprising that political risk usually identified with emerging and frontier markets is the major risk facing the European markets today. One factor that differentiates emerging and frontier basket-case countries from Europe is that political issues in Europe will be solved peacefully and is unlikely to lead to political revolution or a military takeover of a country. For instance, countries like Egypt or Thailand have gone from democratic to dictatorship or military almost overnight. This type of radical change will not occur in Germany or France or any other European nation. So pressure of political risks hanging over European stocks will eventually go away and they will recover to catch up with their American counterparts.

The following chart shows European stocks are lagging their US peers:

Click to enlarge

us-vs-european-stocks-performance

The table below lists seven political events that pose adverse risk to equity markets:

european-political-risks

 

Source: Schroders Economic and Strategy Viewpoint, Oct 2016, Schroders

Investors looking to take advantage of the current discount can consider the following stocks for further research:

  • Banking: ING Group (ING) – Buy with both hands under $10 per share, Nordea Bank (NRBAY), Svenska Handelsbanken AB (SVNLY)
  • Industrials: Siemens (SIEGY)
  • Chemicals: b BASF AG(BASFY), Arkema(ARKAY)
  • Auto-parts: Valeo (VLEEY), Continental AG(CTTAY)
  • Consumer staples: Nestle(NSRGY), Unilever (UL)
  • Oil: Total(TOT), Royal Dutch Shell (RDS-A) and Eni Spa (E)

A simpler and easier way to invest in major European firms is via ETFs. Two ETFs that fit the bill are SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) and SPDR STOXX Europe 50 ETF (FEU).

Disclosure: Long ING, CTTAY

Manufacturing Industry Job Losses Since 2000

The manufacturing industry is one of the hard-hit industries in terms of employment for many decades now. In the years after World War II average Americans with low education and no college degree could live a comfortable middle-class life by getting a job in a local factory. That is no longer possible. Today most such people end up working in minimum wage jobs in retail, restaurants, etc. which will not allow a comfortable lifestyle that they desire.

According to an interesting article in the NY Times recently, globalization and automation has decimated the manufacturing industry in the US. The already suffering manufacturing sector lost an incredible 5.6 million jobs from 2000 to 2010 according to government data. For most of these displaced workers alternative employment of equal pay and benefits are not available due to failure of state policies and brutal private sector focus on the bottom line. While hard-core globalists may argue that such displaced American workers have to go where the jobs are – such as moving to China, India, Brazil or Vietnam, the reality is much different. A worker with family and deep roots in the US, cannot leave the country and move to Shenzen or Bangalore or Saigon for a job. Besides some countries have strict labor laws that ban foreign citizens from working in the country legally especially at the blue collar level. So it can be argued that such workers are effectively trapped as they have nowhere to go.

The chart below shows the decline in manufacturing  jobs since 2000:

Click to enlarge

manufacturing-industry-job-losses-since-2000

Source: More Wealth, More Jobs, but Not for Everyone: What Fuels the Backlash on Trade, NY Times, Sept 28, 2016

Here is an excerpt from the piece:

ROTTERDAM, the Netherlands — For as long as ships have ventured across water, laborers like Patrick Duijzers have tied their fortunes to trade.

He is a longshoreman here at Europe’s largest port, and his black Jack Daniel’s T-shirt, hoop earrings and copious rings give Mr. Duijzers the look of a bohemian pirate. His wages put him solidly in the Dutch middle class: He has earned enough to buy an apartment and enjoy vacations to Spain.

Lately, though, Mr. Duijzers has come to see global trade as a malevolent force. His employer — a unit of the Maersk Group, the Danish shipping conglomerate — is locked in a fiercely competitive battle around the world.

He sees trucking companies replacing Dutch drivers with immigrants from Eastern Europe. He bids farewell to older co-workers reluctantly taking early retirement as robots capture their jobs. Over the last three decades, the ranks of his union have dwindled to about 7,000 members, from 25,000.

“More global trade is a good thing if we get a piece of the cake,” Mr. Duijzers said. “But that’s the problem. We’re not getting our piece of the cake.”

The full article is worth a read.